The Pros and Cons of Storing Fertilizer in Grain Bags

Photo credit: J. Dietz, CBC.ca

Six years ago, Albert Wagner needed 100,000 bushels-worth of added storage. The traditional bin route would have cost him about $2.45/bu over 10 years (including a residual value for the bins), but he also had one of two fertilizer bins nearing the end of its useful life. That got him thinking about bagging grain, which led to him thinking about bagging fertilizer, too. When he ran the numbers, he estimated the bagging system would cost about $1.65/bu for grain storage over the same life span (not including operating costs, and no residual value for the equipment).

Wagner, who farms at Stony Plain, Alta., recently presented his experience with bagging fertilizer at FarmTech. Overall he says the experience has been positive. “The bags seal well. We usually store 46-0-0, or a 46-0-0 blend (with 11-52-0),” he says. “We store 600 tonnes in bags per year.” The main benefit, he says, is that he really has unlimited storage now, allowing him to take delivery at any time. The cost savings of buying and storing fertilizer in the fall vs. spring purchases paid for the total capital investment in the first two years.

There are, however, a few management considerations. First, bags are susceptible to tears and rips, either by wildlife or other pests. Just like you would if the bags held grain, Wagner monitors the bags for damage on a regular basis and repairs any holes immediately. Siting of the bags is also important, as rainfall and spring melt water could both wreak havoc on the contents (not to mention cause an environmental headache). Wagner makes sure to site the bags so that rainfall is most likely to run away from the sealed end, on sandy soil and where spring melt waters don’t accumulate.

Some farmers wondered how fertilizer might impact the actual equipment, to which Wagner replies that it’s a maintenance cost just like any other. “What do you do when your combine wears out? You replace it.” That said, he says they always wash the extractor after using it for fertilizer to decrease the corrosive risk.

 

Lyndsey Smith

Lyndsey Smith is a field editor for RealAgriculture. A self-proclaimed agnerd, Lyndsey is passionate about all things farming but is especially thrilled by agronomy and livestock production.

Trending

Wheat prices jump into August — This week in the grain markets

This week, winter wheat prices touched a three-year high, but it didn’t last. Chicago SRW wheat prices for September 2018 gained 5 per cent or about 26 cents US/bushel to close at $5.56. While the December 2018 contract was up 5.4 percent — or nearly 30 cents — to finish a tad under $5.80. In…Read more »

Related

3 Comments

Sean Hartsook

I’ll bet the environmentalists are loving this idea. His fertilizer must be cheaper than the rest of ours too. I can’t imagine what a mess a wet spring could do to the fertilizer.

Reply
Shaun Haney

Sean I agree with you. I have bagged grain in the past but I would never imagine bagging fertilizer. With the cost of fert nowadays I could not imagine risking it spoiling and turning into concrete in the bin. A little moisture and the fertilizer would be a rock.

Reply
Shaun Haney

From FACEBOOK: Gerrid Gust That’s a wreck waiting to happen. I’ve never lost money on good fertilizer bins and none of the worry about baby sitting bags.

Reply

Leave a Reply

 

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.