Reflecting back then on the year that’s passing, as well as thinking towards the one ahead, it made me wonder if McClure’s approach might work for the agri-food sector, too, which continues to struggle at home with perception and outside pressure.
A key to this approach is for farmers to accept the premise that consumers (Canadian consumers, for the sake of this discussion) are their customers.
I think they are, but I know it’s a debatable notion among some producers, who think the next person in the value chain – such as the person who directly buys their crops and livestock — is their customer.
It’s certainly important to care about your business colleagues’ problems. Imperative, in fact.
But ultimately, consumers buy or use what farmers produce, regardless of how many others add value or intervene. And as taxpayers and citizens, they also can influence the very way producers farm. To me, a strong case can be made for putting consumers near the top of the list of farmers’ customers.
So then, what are their problems?
I’d start that discussion by considering what is not a problem for consumers when it comes to food. And the first thing that comes to mind is supply, at least in terms of volume.
Canadian consumers have lots of food. Globally, that’s not the case, but for the most part, there is ample food available in Canada if you can afford to buy it.
That means well-intentioned statements proclaiming Canadian farmers produce an abundance of food – which is a pretty popular thing for farmers to say, especially around the holidays, when we eat in abundance — is not addressing one of consumers’ big problems.
So then how about affordability?
Well, it’s insensitive to broadly label food affordable in Canada, given the number of people who use food banks. But it’s not solely the cost of food that makes people use food banks, it’s the cost of everything, the cost of living in our modern world. And compared to many other countries, food in Canada is relatively affordable. There is certainly significant competition among grocery stores that keep prices in check.
Once again, then, if the price of food is not a burning issue with Canadians, saying you’re working hard to keep costs low is admirable but not addressing what they perceive is a problem.
Still further down the list is food safety. Some people think it’s a problem, but common sense tells you it’s not. Everything is relative, but given the amount of food we consume compared to safety problems with it, we’re doing fine. Indeed, bouts of food poisoning occur, and they can be nasty. But people who trot out statistics that suggest food is unsafe seldom present them in relation to the numbers of meals consumed. Overall, food is very safe, and people work hard to keep it that way.
But consumers do have some problems, though…at least two that I can think of. And farmers could help with both of them.
The first is food waste. You may have read an earlier commentary I wrote for Real Agriculture that food waste has become a $31-billion a year problem. Up to 40 per cent of all food is wasted – that’s 40 per cent of what you grow and 40 per cent of what consumers buy.
How wholesome the agri-food community would seem if it launched a campaign to help consumers with this problem! Explaining the many ways to reduce food waste at home is not complicated. Just point out where waste occurs, then explain ways to reduce it.
The second problem consumers have is confusion.
Consumers have a high regard for farmers, but I sense they’re starting to lose a bit of faith. They’re inundated with activists telling them farms have become soulless, toxic-spewing corporations, that livestock are constantly abused on farm and that the only food that can be trusted is organic fare from farmers’ markets (or A&W).
Me, I don’t have any problem with organic fare from farmers’ markets. I don’t eat it much, but if someone wants to farm organically, so what?
I do, though, have a problem with activists feeding lies about agriculture to consumers. And I believe farmers’ could help people with this particular problem, because farmers know the truth. Explaining the truth is seldom complicated; you don’t have to try to remember what you said.
That doesn’t mean the communication process is easy, given the well-oiled anti-agriculture machine that’s working non-stop to tell its story.
But toeing the line is not an option. We’ve seen very recent and alarming evidence in Ontario that society and farming are falling out of step. And that’s a problem for both.
It’s time to reflect on what happened in 2014, and take measures to fix it in the New Year. Agriculture can help people with their problems, and needs a new approach to keep consumers’ faith.
- Four steps to successful agvocating
- Use the big sledgehammer less often for long-term herbicide resistance management