Have Our Cake and Eat it Too — Recognizing the Role of Agriculture and Food Science in Improving Human Health

Credit: Picjumbo.com

One of the reasons agriculture is an exciting space to work in is that it offers solutions to problems that affect everybody, not the least of which is human illness.

The intrinsic link between agriculture and health is not something that most people, including politicians, fully realize or value. Too often the story about modern ag and food science is tied to health problems (whether accurate or not), with the regular culprits including genetic modification, gluten, pesticides, growth promotants, high fructose corn syrup, and so on. Lost in the negative stream of stories is the positive impact high-tech agriculture and food processing can have on addressing the chronic illnesses prevalent in Western countries. Agriculture is not only an obvious solution to problems with hunger or starvation, but also the illnesses that tend to come from an abundance of food, such as diabetes and heart disease. This is something that needs to be recognized and understood by everybody involved in human health, whether they’re in the health-care system or influencing policy that impacts health and nutrition.

Money can be a powerful motivator of action, and a study released by the Manitoba Agri-Health Research Network last week was the latest to outline the financial reasons for promoting health solutions through the agriculture and food sector. Agriculture economist Maria Jose Patino Valiente found the Manitoba government could reduce its annual health-care budget by $360 to $400 million — or more than 10 percent — if Manitobans included more “functional foods” in their diets (read the executive summary here.)

The list of healthy foods used for the study doesn’t consist of trendy “superfoods” promoted on afternoon TV shows or popular blogs. No, it’s a list of what Canadian farms are already producing: canola oil, flaxseed, pulses, whole grains, potatoes, eggs, dairy, turkey, bison, freshwater fish, honey and grass-fed beef. If you’re the health minister looking after the largest portfolio in the provincial budget, those kinds of numbers should warrant some serious consideration about proactively investing health-care dollars in capturing the health benefits from what’s being grown on Canadian farms.

Credit: Picjumbo.com

Credit: Picjumbo.com

One of the main obstacles preventing us from eating more of these healthy foods (or these foods in a healthy form) is that we simply like our food the way it is. Taste and texture tend to trump nutrition. We don’t want to change what we eat. And that’s another reason why this is so exciting — because maybe we don’t have to.

Scientists at places like the Richardson Centre for Functional Foods in Winnipeg have developed pastas, soups, cookies, chocolate bars, brownies and other food products that taste good and contain bioactive ingredients with numerous health benefits, including boosting brain health, reducing cholesterol and mitigating heart disease. So while we’re nowhere close to having a magic pill, advancements in ag research and food science are unlocking opportunities for us to eat the same foods we always have, but without all the same negative consequences. We can have our cake and eat it too, and it might even be good for us.

These types of stories and this perspective on the relationship between agriculture and health don’t get the attention they deserve.

So what should be done? For governments, the savings from increased consumption of “functional foods” alone should lead to a more proactive approach to health-care, including an effort to make these foods more accessible. Farmers and processors are more than willing to produce healthier food ingredients if there’s an incentive (the premium paid for specialty canola oils would be one example among many.) And for everyone else, it’s very simple — rather than taking medication to cure a disease, why not prevent it in the first place by eating healthier?

Whether individually or as society, it’s time we recognize and promote the solutions the agriculture and food sector holds for addressing our health.

Related:

 

Kelvin Heppner

Kelvin Heppner is a field editor and radio host for RealAgriculture and RealAg Radio. He's been reporting on agriculture on the prairies and across Canada since 2008(ish). He farms with his family near Altona, Manitoba, and is on Twitter at @realag_kelvin. @realag_kelvin

Trending

Wheat prices jump into August — This week in the grain markets

This week, winter wheat prices touched a three-year high, but it didn’t last. Chicago SRW wheat prices for September 2018 gained 5 per cent or about 26 cents US/bushel to close at $5.56. While the December 2018 contract was up 5.4 percent — or nearly 30 cents — to finish a tad under $5.80. In…Read more »

Related

One Comment

richardbarrett

Reducing cholesterol is not a health benefit but to remove what is causing the damage to the arteries is. Cholesterol is in the body to heal the damage caused by trans-fats. For more information and the history why ‘butter is better’ go to the You tube: The Oiling of America, or http://www.youtube.com/Watch/v=fvKdYUCUca8.
You can not get good food without good soil full of good micro-organisms.
Thanks Real Agriculture for articles on No-till with year round cover crops. These will have many farmers to rethink what is happening to their soil. I want to warn them, it takes 3 – 7 years to turn a break even point after the 1 -2 years of changing a mind set that tells us ’tilling loosens the soil up and helps rain to sink in and it lessens weeds’.

Reply

Leave a Reply

 

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.