Climate Change Policy Conversations Should be on Farmers' Radar

Farmers and farm groups need to be involved in planning policies to address climate change, says the head of Keystone Agricultural Producers — Manitoba’s general farm group.

The new federal government has made reducing national greenhouse gas emissions a priority, committing to the creation of a pan-Canadian framework for combatting climate change and to meeting emissions reduction targets. Details are thin, but climate change and the environment were mentioned numerous times in the ministerial mandate letters shared by the Trudeau government last week.

The prime minister plans to meet with provincial and territorial leaders in Ottawa on November 23 to discuss national climate change commitments before heading to Paris for the UN-organized climate change conference that begins November 30.


KAP president Dan Mazier spoke with RealAg’s Kelvin Heppner at a KAP district meeting earlier this week.

At the provincial level, Ontario intends to join the cap and trade system that Quebec is already part of in 2017. The Ontario government began a 30 day public comment period on the proposal on Monday. Several other provinces, including Alberta and BC, already have carbon taxes, although Alberta Premier Rachel Notley has said she will unveil planks of a new climate-change strategy before she heads to Paris.

Dan Mazier
Dan Mazier

KAP president Dan Mazier says farmers should be paying attention to and participating in all these discussions, as he’s concerned about agriculture being viewed as an “energy-hungry” industry.

“We need a lot more study on just how much energy it does take and what is the net benefit or deficit that we’re using,” he says in the interview below. “There’s some opportunity there to step up and say ‘here’s what agriculture is doing.’ I think we’d all be surprised just how positive a balance we do contribute.”

Manitoba Ag Minister Ron Kostyshyn has told KAP emissions reduction policies will not cost farmers anything, but Mazier hints he’s skeptical.

“Transportation is the number one emitter (in Manitoba) and agriculture is number two. If you’re number two, I can’t help but think about how we’ll be viewed in the future,” he says.

Related: What does Ontario’s Commitment to Cap & Trade Mean for Agriculture?

Ontario Premier Kathleen Wynne and Environment Minister Glen Murray announced plans to implement a cap and trade program back in April 2015.
Ontario Premier Kathleen Wynne and Environment Minister Glen Murray announced plans to implement a cap and trade program back in April 2015.

In Ontario, the Ontario Federation of Agriculture believes agriculture is a solution provider, as farms can be managed to achieve emissions reductions. No-till, manure and fertilizer management, cattle feeding efficiencies and other practices could provide carbon offsets, which when aggregated, can be sold to point source polluters, as they have been in Alberta. The OFA sees the carbon credit market as a potential revenue stream for Ontario farmers, as opposed to a cost.

While there are still many questions to be answered, the impact new climate change policies will have on farms depends on how they’re designed, which is why Mazier is hopeful after hearing new federal Agriculture Minister Lawrence MacAulay tell farm groups he wants to meet with and listen to them.

“Hopefully we don’t end up on the short end of the stick, but at least somewhere in the conversation,” he says.

2 thoughts on “Climate Change Policy Conversations Should be on Farmers’ Radar

  1. I wish this carbon tax, cap & trade, carbon reduction ideology would stop because there too much evidence that is showing abuse of these schemes with no real benefit to citizens or the environment. How about we stop the scam that is carbon pollution, AGW, climate change, clean tech future, decarbonisation, and focus on how we need to pull ppl out of poverty and use our resources wisely http://ow.ly/UNxJg “With leaders gathering in Paris later this month for a major climate summit, it is clear that our modern-day approach to climate change is backwards. We spend a massive amount of effort trying to make carbon too expensive and unappealing for the world to use. Instead, we need to make green energy much cheaper.
    Our dependency on carbon-emitting fuels is overwhelming. The fact is that the world will not stop using fossil fuels for many decades. Despite all the excitement about green energy, globally we get a minuscule 0.4 percent of our energy from wind and solar panels.”

  2. if you believe our government wont point the finger at us and tell all the urban population that those evil farmers are killing our environment you are very mistaken, just look at the neonic ban.

Leave a Reply

 

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.