Health Canada Proposing Changes to Antimicrobial Drug Rules for Livestock

Proposed amendments to Canada’s Food and Drug Regulations were outlined in more detail this week, after a brief announcement by Health Canada on June 30, 2016. The potential changes look to “strengthen rules governing the importation, sale and use of antimicrobial drugs in livestock.”

“Health Canada’s proposal to strengthen the rules around the use of these drugs in livestock is one step we are taking to address the growing public health problem of antimicrobial resistance and to ensure that these drugs remain effective in the years to come,” said Minister of Health Jane Phipott, in a release.

The Food and Drug Regulations (FDR) currently do not provide the necessary regulatory oversight of antimicrobials for veterinary use to mitigate the risk of AMR. – Canada Gazette, July 2.

The changes, as outlined in the Canada Gazette on July 2, are intended to:

  • require veterinary active pharmaceutical ingredients (APIs) imported or sold in Canada to be manufactured in accordance with good manufacturing practices (GMPs);
  • require persons who fabricate, package/label, import or test an API for veterinary use to do so in accordance with an establishment licence (EL);
  • restrict the own use importation of certain unauthorized drugs (including APIs);
  • require manufacturers and importers to provide sales volume information by species for veterinary antimicrobials; and
  • introduce an alternative, more appropriate pathway for manufacturers to legally import and sell low-risk veterinary health products (VHPs)

“The proposed amendments to the FDR are necessary to respond to the serious and growing public health threat of AMR by improving the regulatory oversight of antimicrobials for veterinary use,” reads the article in the Canada Gazette.

If implemented, the changes are anticipated to cost industry and government $41.6 million over the next ten years.

Canadians will have the opportunity to provide feedback over a 75-day consultation period, ending September 14, 2016.

Comments and suggested revisions can be sent directly to the Veterinary Drugs Directorate at [email protected].

Read More:

Related:

 

RealAgriculture News Team

A team effort of RealAgriculture's videographers and editorial staff to make sure that you have the latest in what is happening in agriculture.

Trending

Wheat prices jump into August — This week in the grain markets

This week, winter wheat prices touched a three-year high, but it didn’t last. Chicago SRW wheat prices for September 2018 gained 5 per cent or about 26 cents US/bushel to close at $5.56. While the December 2018 contract was up 5.4 percent — or nearly 30 cents — to finish a tad under $5.80. In…Read more »

Related

4 Comments

Christine Dargis Laramee

Wow!! Will we be now liable for animal abuse now that we cannot treat a sick calf?? Question for You..Are we liable when we do not treat our sick children with antibiotics?? Same thing!! Guess we may now take the governments to courts for animal abuse…I’m Game!!

Reply
Angie Nussbaumer

As a mother, wife, friend, and daughter I do worry about the health of my family. Antibiotic resistance is a real threat to our current and future health. As a dairy farmer I beleive its our duty to produce food that keeps our society safe. We can not fear of the challenge of using our antibiotics in a more responsible manner. We must play our part in society without greed and grave concern for others.

Reply
w robinson

The number one drug that needs to be regulated is glyphosate. Monsanto has “NEVER” proven it is safe!!!!!!!!!!!!!! There are peer reviews from the 80’s that show it is not safe! These have been totally ignored!!!!! Tells you what money can do!!!!!!!!!!

Reply

Leave a Reply

 

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.