Breaking Down the Hot Air and Cold Truth About Carbon Emissions

Mario Tenuta and some of the equipment he uses to measure greenhouse gas emissions from farming.

Mario Tenuta has been studying greenhouse gas emissions in agriculture for longer than he’s willing to admit.

Never before has he seen this much interest in the topic.

“We’ve always had interest in carbon sequestration and the use of nitrogen fertilizers and manures, but now where we are called to some form of action and reductions, now there is great interest,” says Tenuta, who’s the chair of the agroecology program in the Department of Soil Sciences Department at the University of Manitoba.

There’s been plenty of discussion and concerns expressed about the impact of government carbon policy on agriculture after Prime Minister Trudeau announced plans for a national price on carbon several weeks ago.

In response, Tenuta took to Twitter answering questions and sharing information about greenhouse gas emissions using the clever hashtag #HotAirColdTruth.

Mario Tenuta joined Kelvin Heppner at the Canola Discovery Forum in Winnipeg this week to discuss #HotAirColdTruth and some of the basics around carbon emissions from Canadian agriculture (as heard on RealAg Radio on SiriusXM.)

As he explains in the interview above, when politicians or scientists talk about greenhouse gas or carbon emissions, there are three gases of concern for agriculture:

  • Carbon dioxide — CO2 is emitted from the decomposition of crop residue and soil organic matter. as well as from the burning of fossil fuels. As Tenuta notes, emissions from fuels are categorized nationally under transportation, not agriculture.
    Crop and grazing lands also remove CO2 from the air, storing it as soil organic carbon. Since this carbon is not considered to be sequestered permanently, it’s not included in the national reduction inventory.  (The emissions of other forms of greenhouse gases are converted into a C02 equivalent, which is why when we hear and use the terms “carbon pricing” or “carbon tax,” it can also apply to other greenhouse gases.)
  • Methane — CH4 is the gas that mainly comes from livestock production, such as enteric emissions from ruminants and from manure. Methane is 20 to 30 times more potent than C02.
  • Nitrous oxide — N2O is emitted as a result of the use of nitrogen fertilizer. N20 Is 300 times (!) more potent in terms of warming the atmosphere than C02, explains Tenuta.
    N2O emissions can vary widely from one field to another, depending on soil type, rainfall, and fertilizer practices, and other factors, he explains: “Usually we want things that are easy to develop policy on. N2O emissions on farmers’ fields are extremely difficult to predict, especially on a field-by-field basis.”

Carbon tax and government policy aside, Tenuta believes the low hanging fruit for reducing emissions from agriculture lies in implementing the 4R nutrient strategy for nitrogen fertilizer — right source, right place, right time and right rate. It’s all about maximizing nitrogen efficiency by only making it available in the nitrate form as the plant needs it. That might mean banding fertilizer rather than broadcasting it, or using nitrogen stabilizers to slow the conversion to nitrate.

Ideally, government policy should be designed to help farmers increase crop production per unit of nitrogen fertilizer, he says.

“We don’t want to see a reduction in production. The idea of optimizing what inputs you have to do, such as nitrogen…we want to get the most bang from it,” he explains.

Not only are farmers expressing interest, Tenuta says policymakers at both the provincial and federal levels are paying attention to the carbon research he and his colleagues across the country are doing.

“We need tangible data on emissions and nitrogen management practices to first of all, know how many emissions are happening, and then to figure out the impact of incentives or a tax.”

Listen to our conversation above for more on what’s known about greenhouse gas emissions from farming in Canada.

 

Kelvin Heppner

Kelvin Heppner is a field editor for Real Agriculture based near Altona, Manitoba. Prior to joining Real Ag he spent more than 10 years working in radio. He farms with his father near Rosenfeld, MB and is on Twitter at

@realag_kelvin

Trending

Cold winter coming to the prairies, snow in the east

Snowmobile owners in Ontario and Quebec may want to get their sleds ready, while prairie dwellers may want to sell the snowmobile and put the money toward the heating budget or a down payment on a warm place further south. Okay, maybe it's a little early to make those decisions, but according to AccuWeather's winter…Read more »

Related

2 Comments

Ken Brown

Somehow in our governments’ grope for new ways to tax producers as a continuing source of revenue, they have forgotten their elementary school science that taught them about the respiration cycle where plants take in CO2 and give off Oxygen. We are in the era of continuous cropping and these practices give off oxygen every day from seeding until harvest and this should off set a portion of the CO2 we use to produce our crops.

Reply
Dennis Laughton

In May 2008 Alberta Reduced Tillage Linkages published “Impact of Direct Seeding in Alberta” in which their research showed a savings of 6 litres of fuel /acre /year, emissions reduction of 2.7 kg of CO2e per litre of fuel burned, Carbon sequestration of 0.145 tonnes / acre / year and more. Should still be found on AB ag. website.

Reply

Leave a Reply