Ag ministers reach deal on new framework dubbed the “Canadian Agricultural Partnership”

Federal, provincial, territorial agricultural ministers in St. John’s, Newfoundland and Labrador this week.

Agriculture ministers from across Canada say they reached an agreement in St. John’s today on the core elements of the next agriculture policy framework, which will be called the “Canadian Agricultural Partnership.”

CAP is a five-year $3 billion federal-provincial-territorial funding agreement that will replace the current framework, known as Growing Forward 2, which expires at the end of March 2018.

“Our main goal was to reach an agreement on the next policy framework for agriculture, and I’m pleased to say we did just that,” announced federal Agriculture Minister Lawrence MacAulay, in a press conference this morning.

The agreement maintains the same overall level of funding as Growing Forward 2.

Among the changes in business risk management programs is a new cap on the AgriStability reference margin limits implemented in Growing Forward 2 to “ensure producers from all sectors will have improved access to support under the program, regardless of their cost-structure.” This will guarantee all producers at least 70 percent of their reference margin, according to Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada.

To compensate for the changes to AgriStability reference margins, AgriInvest and AgriStability will have minimum payments increased to $250. The government’s matching payments under AgriInvest will also be capped at $10,000 per producer, down from $15,000, while the maximum allowable net sales eligible under AgriInvest will be reduced to $1 million, down from $1.5 million.

A late participation option has also been added to AgriStability, where provincial and territorial governments can decide to allow late sign-up to AgriStability in situations where there’s a significant income decline and a gap in participation. Producers who enrol late will see a 20 percent reduction in coverage.

“Saskatchewan does not support late participation in AgriStability as we believe it goes directly against the principle of proactive risk management and does not fix a problem producers have identified,” said Saskatchewan Ag Minister Lyle Stewart, while Alberta Ag Minister Oneil Carlier said he had “misgivings” about the late participation mechanism.

The ministers also agreed to undertake a year-long review of business risk management programs to assess how well they’re working, as requested by Ontario and a coalition of farm organizations. The report will not have any effect on BRM programs taking effect on April 1, 2018, as “the agriculture sector indicated to us they wanted no lapse in the program,” said MacAulay. Ministers will be presented with findings from the review in July 2018.

Overall, the CAP agreement focuses on six priority areas:

  • Science, research and innovation
  • Markets and trade
  • Environmental sustainability and climate change
  • Value-added agriculture and processing
  • Public trust
  • Risk management

While the agreement signed today covers the “core elements,” many of the details on what programs will look like provincially will be determined in the coming months.

Related:

 

Kelvin Heppner

Kelvin Heppner is a field editor for Real Agriculture based near Altona, Manitoba. Prior to joining Real Ag he spent more than 10 years working in radio. He farms with his father near Rosenfeld, MB and is on Twitter at

@realag_kelvin

Trending

First rural municipalities ready to roll with Farm 911

Municipalities are stepping forward to help Ontario’s Farm 911 emergency signage project for agricultural land get off the ground. The initiative, named “The Emily Project” after seven-year-old Emily Trudeau who died in a farm accident in 2014, is designed to promote the idea that emergency addresses and signage are important for vacant rural land, including…Read more »

Related

One Comment

Eric Jorgensen

Can anyone tell me if CAP will provide support for the Diseased Bison Surveys at Wood Buffalo National Park as was provided under GF 2? This needs to be continued to protect the disease free Wood Bison and ensure separation from Northern Alberta’s cattle herds. We recently saw what happens when Bovine Tuberculosis shows up and it will be much worse if an unrelated case shows up within the 48 month grace period.

Reply

Leave a Reply