Risk versus reward: thinking critically about cover crops

It’s hard to find a farmer these days who doesn’t see some of the benefits cover crops can bring to their operation. From reduced soil erosion to improved soil structure, nutrient recycling, moisture retention and much more – the list of benefits is long and impressive. But how much is too much? Where and when do cover crops create more risk than reward?

To get more perspective on these questions, RealAgriculture asked two of Ontario’s leading crop researchers to weigh in on the conversation. We caught up with OMAFRA plant pathologist Albert Tenuta and University of Guelph researcher David Hooker at the recent SouthWest Crop Diagnostic Day at Guelph’s Ridgetown campus.

While sharing observations from their current research, Tenuta and Hooker discuss planting green and the challenges and risks growers need to understand when planting cover crops. Hooker, who also farms, discusses what he wants to know from a grower’s perspective, as well as a researcher, to gain the benefits of cover crops for his farm while mitigating the risks.

In this video, Tenuta and Hooker also compare and contrast how cover crops fit in corn and soybean management systems. They take a close-up look at a series of research plots demonstrating how corn and soybeans perform when planted into a cereal rye cover crop that has been desiccated in April or rolled, as well as how corn fares in a green rye crop that’s burned down in early June.

Please accept to view this content.

Tenuta notes that the impact of disease is a big part his research focus. He says early research indicates that soil borne pathogens – from fusarium to rhizoctonia and pythium – have a larger window to impact the crop when green cover is present. He adds that one way to mitigate that risk is to remove the green bridge to create a 10 to 14-day period where the cover crop is killed prior to planting.

See Related articles: 

Leave a Reply


This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Privacy Preference Center


Necessary cookies help make a website usable by enabling basic functions like page navigation and access to secure areas of the website. The website cannot function properly without these cookies.

gdpr, __cfduid, PHPSESSID, wordpress_test_cookie, woocommerce_items_in_cart, woocommerce_cart_hash, wp_woocommerce_session, wordpress_logged_in, wordpress_sec, wp-settings, wp-settings-time, __cf_mob_redir, wordpress_cache, realag


Measuring interactions with the ads on the domain.



These are used to track user interaction and detect potential problems. These help us improve our services by providing analytical data on how users use this site.



Preference cookies enable the website to remember information that changes the way the website behaves or looks, like your preferred language or the region that you are in.

chartdefaults, comment_author, comment_author_email, comment_author_url
JSESSIONID, _os_session,anonymous_votes,csrf-param,csrf-token,user,user-id,user-platform,intercom-session,intercom-lou,intercom-session
personalization_id, tfw_exp


Register for a RealAgriculture account to manage your Shortcut menu instead of the default.