Sending Trudeau to China would be a counter-productive move

Many times, a face-to-face meeting is the best way to solve a problem. It minimizes keyboard bravery and conference-call bluffing, but in the case of high stakes international diplomacy things are different. There is a process to follow which can be difficult to recognize when people want a solution fast.

Farmers are frustrated with the China/canola issue and that more is not being done. Many farmers have asked why our prime minister is not getting on a plane himself and heading to China.

While it seems like a good idea, there are those that don’t think it is. Carlo Dade, of the Canada West Foundation, says that sending taking your biggest, largest asset— which would be an official visit of the Prime Minister —and expending it at the beginning of negotiations when the other side thinks you have no leverage is not an intelligent move.

RELATED: Who would be the best to lead a “high level delegation” to China to sort out the canola issue?

Jeff English, of Thinkshift, is the former press secretary of former Agriculture Minister Gerry Ritz. He agrees with Dade’s assessment. “To send over someone at a prime ministerial level to get this fixed is essentially the last card we have and would be a gross escalation at this point,” he says.

Process does not lend itself to speed, but according to English and Dade, Canada needs to play this issue smart as well.  “Canola growers cannot afford any further potential missteps with China as a solution will not be easy even if played perfectly,” says Shaun Haney, host of RealAg Radio.

“This would be a really, really, really counter productive move,” Dade says.

You can hear the entire interview with Carlo Dade of the Canada West Foundation below

3 thoughts on “Sending Trudeau to China would be a counter-productive move

  1. The talk of this not being resolved quickly is not surprising after all we are just farmers, you want to kick someone we are use to it
    But for every action there is an opposite reaction, Canola will go down in price will be very hard to move if this is a drawn out process and I suspect when the price is low enough China will come back and buy leaving us in the same position loss of profit less spending on equipment upgrades the nock as always will hit more than farmers.
    If someone was attacking your child in the street would you look out the window and say oh dear I will call and wait for the police to come or would you confront the attacker to rescue your child, in the Bible David was a shepherd aka farmer picked up small rock s and with a sling
    Brought down a giant Goliath why are we always so scared of bullies do something and do it know!

  2. Can you imagine the uproar if he said the Chinese leader was from Japan? How about cutting off the money that we send to China because of some “clerical errors”?
    We would be sending a knife to a gun fight.

Leave a Reply

 

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.