Pending election results and what it means for U.S. agriculture

Anyone who follows politics knows election nights can be long, and the following mornings rather early.

The 2020 U.S. Presidential election has been no different. As of Wednesday morning, it still could be anyone’s game south of the border.

Jim Wiesemeyer of Pro Farmer joins Shaun Haney for some insight into the election. Wiesemeyer says that on the house side, it seems the Republicans will gain some house seats.

Wiesemeyer foresees some recounting of ballots, contesting the results, and possibly some court battles ahead. But, the biggest impact of last night’s election results? Collin Peterson from Minnesota, Chairman of the House Committee on Agriculture, is out. The rural vote has been important for Republicans, and it looks to have increased in importance.

As of yet, ballots are still being counted, and projecting the winner isn’t a safe bet, as it’s too close to call. To make the line even greyer, the ballot handling system is different from state to state. It begs the question, does that part of the system need to be re-evaluated? Wiesemeyer says yes.

“That’s the law, but I do think that should be reviewed, especially now that we’ve had an avalanche of either voting early, absentee ballots, or mail-in ballots,” says Wiesemeyer. “Some of these northern purist states were not ready for that — it was the usual thing in some southern states and we saw how many dealt with that better.”

If Biden does find the path to victory — with the Democrats having the house and a Republican Senate — the House Agriculture Committee focus could change more to food nutrition issues and food safety, which is a major shift from its current focus. Previous Chairman Collin Peterson was able to appeal to both crowds, which as we know, isn’t an easy task to do.

“There is a push by some farm-state lawmakers and some commodity group lobbyists that are urging the Biden group — if he is the next president — to pick Collin as the USDA Agriculture secretary,” says Wiesemeyer. Many speculate this would be good news for production agriculture, but there’s still many decisions (and ballots counted) that need to happen before we can look too far down that road.

Watch the full interview for Wiesemeyer’s insights into how the remaining states will change the overall outcomes and how the house, senate, and presidential changes (or no change) will affect U.S. agriculture.

Leave a Reply

 

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Privacy Preference Center

Necessary

Necessary cookies help make a website usable by enabling basic functions like page navigation and access to secure areas of the website. The website cannot function properly without these cookies.

gdpr, __cfduid, PHPSESSID, wordpress_test_cookie, woocommerce_items_in_cart, woocommerce_cart_hash, wp_woocommerce_session, wordpress_logged_in, wordpress_sec, wp-settings, wp-settings-time, __cf_mob_redir, wordpress_cache, realag
__cfduid

Marketing

Measuring interactions with the ads on the domain.

__gads,fsk_ut_2317
IDE

Statistics

These are used to track user interaction and detect potential problems. These help us improve our services by providing analytical data on how users use this site.

_ga,_gid,_gat,_cb,_chartbeat2,_chartbeat4
_ga,_gid
metrics_token

Preferences

Preference cookies enable the website to remember information that changes the way the website behaves or looks, like your preferred language or the region that you are in.

chartdefaults, comment_author, comment_author_email, comment_author_url
JSESSIONID, _os_session,anonymous_votes,csrf-param,csrf-token,user,user-id,user-platform,intercom-session,intercom-lou,intercom-session
personalization_id, tfw_exp

 

Register for a RealAgriculture account to manage your Shortcut menu instead of the default.

Register