Possible winners and losers of the pending Clean Fuel Standard — a LIVE! with Marla Orenstein


Canada’s Clean Fuel Standard is likely to be published Friday, kicking off a comment period ahead of the standard becoming law. For a what-we-know and what-we-don’t discussion, we go to Marla Orenstein, of the Canada West Foundation, on this RealAg LIVE! Q&A.

Don’t miss a new LIVE! every weekday at 3 pm E on social media!


  • Who is the Canada West Foundation?
  • CWF has put out a report on the “Citizen’s Guide to the Clean Fuel Standard”
  • Lower greenhouse gas emissions, lower the carbon intensity of the fuel we use
  • Carbon tax vs. Clean Fuel Standard. They are different!
  • Carbon tax is about sticker shock to change behaviour.
  • CFS is about changing the fuel before it gets to the consumption
  • Low fat pizza. Gross.
  • What sectors like it vs are not so good with it?
  • Well, the changes to the CFS announced last week will make some industries happier than others. So mining, etc., are a little happier.
  • CFS is now just focused on diesel and gas, liquids. More in-line with places like California. Increased 2 to 4 cents only (though likely to be more here in Canada)
  • But the government hasn’t let us “peek under the hood”
  • Gazette this Friday? Maybe.
  • So what IS it going to cost? As high as 11 cents per litre, just from the CFS (not the carbon tax), but could be more like 5 to 7 cents/litre
  • Will pumps have to change for E15?
  • There will be a national infrastructure assessment
  • Who comes out ahead? Biofuel manufacturers, for sure. Ethanol and biodiesel. Hydrogen and renewable natural gas will likely not benefit as much as they could have.
  • Do farmers win? Well…
  • Land-use requirements. Devil is in the details.
  • Feds have eased up on land-use requirements, so that’s probably good news for farmers for corn and canola
  • Marker year. Why does it matter? Ultimate objective is to make changes to reach this goal, but not at all costs (other aspects of the environment)
  • Who wins? re: crops. There aren’t restrictions on feed stocks, yet.
  • Is the energy industry coming around to this? The silence has been deafening.
  • Carbon price at $170 per tonne by 2030 adds some certainty
  • But does that price of carbon bring investment back to energy sector? Dig deeper.
  • Electric or hydrogen vehicles? Where do they fit?
  • Can farmers offer carbon credits? We don’t know.
  • Unintended consequences: breaking a criminal law
  • Food vs. fuel discussion. Will people go hungry because of a fuel standard? Likely not.
  • And, capacity. Are we there?
  • Does this set the stage for carbon tariffs?  YES. Likely.
  • We also do need to know the numbers. Let us see the numbers.

Leave a Reply


This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Privacy Preference Center


Necessary cookies help make a website usable by enabling basic functions like page navigation and access to secure areas of the website. The website cannot function properly without these cookies.

gdpr, __cfduid, PHPSESSID, wordpress_test_cookie, woocommerce_items_in_cart, woocommerce_cart_hash, wp_woocommerce_session, wordpress_logged_in, wordpress_sec, wp-settings, wp-settings-time, __cf_mob_redir, wordpress_cache, realag


Measuring interactions with the ads on the domain.



These are used to track user interaction and detect potential problems. These help us improve our services by providing analytical data on how users use this site.



Preference cookies enable the website to remember information that changes the way the website behaves or looks, like your preferred language or the region that you are in.

chartdefaults, comment_author, comment_author_email, comment_author_url
JSESSIONID, _os_session,anonymous_votes,csrf-param,csrf-token,user,user-id,user-platform,intercom-session,intercom-lou,intercom-session
personalization_id, tfw_exp


Register for a RealAgriculture account to manage your Shortcut menu instead of the default.