Adjusting management or adopting new products or varieties carries some risk, but that risk can be managed with an on-farm evaluation.
Setting up on-farm trials, however, can be simple and straight forward — or so complicated it’s hard to know if you really learned anything at all.
To navigate on-farm trial pitfalls and successes, this episode of The Agronomists features Deb Campbell of Agronomy Advantage, and Steve Larocque of Beyond Agronomy.
Don’t miss The Agronomists, Mondays at 8 pm Eastern on your favourite social media platform!
- Meet our agronomists! Deb from Ontario and Steve from Alberta.
- Why is it so imperative to test ideas on-farm?
- Cut through the noise!
- Your own equipment, soil, climate, and management
- Without doing a test on-farm, you won’t really know
- Setting goals for the trial, too
- Even a long time ago, government extension went through cut backs. Led to a gap in extension, and that gap has widened
- The demand for advice and advisement is only growing
- Build a roadmap for the question you want to answer. Then, the size and scope, who is funding it, what comparisons to make, how to measure?
- Tools are there to capture the data, and some is automatically generated.
- But it’s time consuming, and requires observations
- Don’t fall victim to scope creep!
- Be realistic on whether or not you really have the time required to set up a trial and see it through
- Josh Fankhauser video: What holds farmers back from adopting on-farm trials? Time crunch and stress more so than cost
- 15-acre trials? As an agronomist, you want to encourage steps of change not 1,500 acres!
- Strip trials are sometimes an accident — a plugged manifold for seed-placed phosphorus can teach all sorts of lessons and give you a great comparison
- Good start? Fertilizer rate trials. Seeding rate trials. Easy and cost-effective.
- What about regional/territory representation? Sometimes there is collaboration between farms or with an agronomist
- Budgets: is it about money or acreage? Some are quite expensive (i.e. PGRs)
- Video: Shawn Brenneman, Syngenta. How do you sift through the data and plot results? Tillage, climate, yield, test weight, etc. Is local best?
- What about hybrid or seed selection? That can be really overwhelming. Get to the subset of values that really pertains to your soil type or growing area, for example
- Could host trials for seed companies on your farm to get some of that data specifically for your farm
- VR nitrogen example. Let’s talk analysis! It can take levels of data. Soil type, water holding, NDVI, etc.
- Do you abandon based on an error or do you try and salvage?
- Heck, screw ups ARE trials. But for Alberta, usually a hail event is what wipes out a plot. Sad face.
- Sometimes, damage or poor emergence can become part of the trial
- Success hinges on having a good plan, everyone knows the role, and making sure the details are covered and commitment. You’ve got to be committed to taking a trial all the way through
- False positives? Sometimes five years on!
- Simple also means you can actually assess one factor. Having too many layers means you end up with so much “noise” in the trial, you can’t make any clear interpretations
Subscribe: Apple Podcasts | Google Podcasts | Spotify | RSS | All Podcasts
Please register to read and comment.