The call for a national soil health strategy needs closer inspection

Opinion

The recently announced Bill C-290, the Soil Conservation Act, has many steps to pass through before becoming an act.

The premise of the bill — supporting efforts to create a national soil health strategy, that soil is the foundation for sustainable food production, enhanced biodiversity, cleaner air and water, and are at the root of the agriculture and agri-food value chain — is well-founded. These are facts that we already know and that we know need to be worked on.

I’m sure MP and NDP ag critic Alistair MacGregor has good intentions for the bill, but as a Private Member’s bill of a party not in power, it’s unlikely that this bill will move forward.

But if it can garner support and it passes, then what?

Some of the goals laid out in the first reading are lofty; collecting data, on an ongoing basis, on soil health (using what parameters? what methodology?) including carbon content and sequestration potential, will take massive collaboration on scientists’ parts.

It perhaps comes down to wording, but defining the scope of this work and recognizing previous work done can easily ease that burden.

It begs the question: who will MacGregor consult with after the bill passes and how will previous work be recognized? For example, there’s a report initiated by the Saskatchewan Soil Conservation Association, readily available on their website, on soil organic carbon and carbon sequestration research, that Brian McConkey helmed and many others worked on since 1996.

There are aspects of the initiative that I do agree can be done, like supporting research programs on regenerative soil management, since the principles of regenerative agriculture need to be fleshed out and explored in this country, in order to have clear expectations (i.e. in regards to carbon taxation).

If passed, however, the act should not disregard any previous work done on cover cropping and grazing, and the effect of these practices on soil organic carbon.

On appointing a national soil health advocate, where would that advocate come from: industry or policy? What would their qualifications be?

Finally, declaring World Soil Day and National Soil Conservation Week to be recognized in Canada, is simply a feel-good measure. Plus, we already have a National Soil Conservation Week — it happened just last week.

I’ll admit, it’s a rare occasion when policy catches my eye, but since this is soil related, I’ll be watching to see where this goes.

Leave a Reply

 

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Privacy Preference Center

Necessary

Necessary cookies help make a website usable by enabling basic functions like page navigation and access to secure areas of the website. The website cannot function properly without these cookies.

gdpr, __cfduid, PHPSESSID, wordpress_test_cookie, woocommerce_items_in_cart, woocommerce_cart_hash, wp_woocommerce_session, wordpress_logged_in, wordpress_sec, wp-settings, wp-settings-time, __cf_mob_redir, wordpress_cache, realag
__cfduid

Marketing

Measuring interactions with the ads on the domain.

__gads,fsk_ut_2317
IDE

Statistics

These are used to track user interaction and detect potential problems. These help us improve our services by providing analytical data on how users use this site.

_ga,_gid,_gat,_cb,_chartbeat2,_chartbeat4
_ga,_gid
metrics_token

Preferences

Preference cookies enable the website to remember information that changes the way the website behaves or looks, like your preferred language or the region that you are in.

chartdefaults, comment_author, comment_author_email, comment_author_url
JSESSIONID, _os_session,anonymous_votes,csrf-param,csrf-token,user,user-id,user-platform,intercom-session,intercom-lou,intercom-session
personalization_id, tfw_exp

 

Register for a RealAgriculture account to manage your Shortcut menu instead of the default.

Register